Another Day the Paper-patch
Way
At this point in time, my hypothesis is still that the paper did not come off the bullets properly as they exited the muzzle thereby reducing, at a faster rate, the bullets' velocity on their trip to the target. Mr. Wasserburger suffered a similar fate at The Cup: tight "core" groups followed by low shots. Keep in mind that the rifle used today has a chamber specifically designed for PP shooting and has a choked barrel, but the same problem was observed. The chamber design and choked barrel were still not enough to have consistent accuracy. I will further state that I still believed that the smaller diameter bullet was the cause of the flyers. The Paul Jones PP Money Bullet, which mics at 0.44645", was also shot with no flyers using the tweaked match load. Since it was quite calm, the smoky confetti showers were quite evident. The BACO confetti had large chunks of paper even though the patch used was short by "normal" standards. The Paul Jones bullet produced fine confetti with no large chunks. If I may reiterate, large chunks of confetti seem to indicate the possibility that the load will produce flyers. So far that seems to be the case. A 10-twist, 38-70 was also tested with PP bullets. The chamber is of my standard grease-groove design with no freebore and 3 degrees per side leade angle. The bullet used was a Paul Jones # 1 Elliptical designed to be shot as a GG'less bullet with a 0.500" long, 0.3760" diameter shank. The bore-riding section is 0.3680" in diameter. A 0.3680" diameter Fred Cornell push-through bullet sizing die was used to reduce the shank diameter. The flashing, caused by swaging-down the shank, was removed from the base with an X-acto knife. While this is not optimum, a mold that casts the proper PP bullet is the way to go, it was a quick, cheap test. The results were excellent for a first SWAG at a load. Only one was tested. The barrel is a 10-twist Lilja chromoly with a choke lapped into it. The load components were: Browning 38-70 Grease-groove Rifle
I was pleasantly surprised at the preliminary results. The 10-shot group went about 1.125 MOA of horizontal by 0.86 MOA of vertical. I must admit that the paper-patches had a bit too much overlap. It was not noticed when wet wrapping, but after the bullets were dried the overlap was noticeable. Too much overlap can't help accuracy. How much it degrades accuracy is not known, at this time, by this writer. Since the brass used was neck-turned for bullets that have shanks in the 0.3760" diameter range, the bullet-to-case-to-chamber-neck fit is not what I believe to be optimum so new brass is being made so that there is a tighter fit for the loaded rounds. Even though thicker than normal paper, for my current match loads, was used there was only fine confetti in the plume of smoke, nary a large chunk to be seen or found. Since the bullet shank is 1 thou over bore-diameter, the paper really got shredded/cut but good. More work to come once a "real" Paul Jones PP mold is in hand as sizing down the current bullet does not fit well with what has come to be my mantra for loading BPCR PP rounds: consistency, consistency, consistency. That much sizing can't produce a base that is perpendicular to the shank of the bullet like an as cast bullet from a PJ mold. Cheers, Dan Theodore - March 31, 2008
|